W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-qa-wg@w3.org > January 2003

Re: AI-20021010-02 done - Comm Team

From: Dimitris Dimitriadis <dimitris@ontologicon.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2003 02:56:01 +0100
Cc: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>, Janet Daly <janet@w3.org>, www-qa-wg@w3.org
To: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>
Message-Id: <553AC96F-2763-11D7-A12D-000393556882@ontologicon.com>

I could incorporate the changes as soon as the minutes from the F2F get  
available, since I don't remember everything we agreed on.

/Dimitris
On Tuesday, January 14, 2003, at 01:18  AM, Lofton Henderson wrote:

>
> At 03:12 PM 1/13/03 -0500, Karl Dubost wrote:
>
>> Action Item:
>>
>> asks to Janet if it (CFP for test task force)
>> possible and how to do it and write a Call For
>> Participation (include Dimitris in the loop)
>>
>> Status: done
>>
>> After discussion with Janet, there's no process at W3C to create a  
>> call for participation for creating a Test Task Force. The rationale  
>> is that a Task Force is created inside an already existing WG and  
>> defines just an internal process of the WG to deal with a specific  
>> action.
>>
>> Said that, Janet, as Head of Comm Team, noticed we have done a huge  
>> work inside the QA WG with regards to the resources we have and  
>> acknowledged that it would be more beneficial for us to get more  
>> members participating to the QA WG. To help in this business, she has  
>> proposed to give more publicity to the QA WG in the next Member  
>> newsletter, presenting what we have done and the things we need to  
>> continue.
>>
>> I will work with Susan Lesch on this item for the newsletter.
>
> I would be happy to help, as a reviewer or whatever.
>
>
>> There is also a possibility to advertise a bit the AC Members  
>> directly on their mailing list, but only Janet can do that.
>>
>> The charter for this news TTF has been drafted and is available at
>> <URL:http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-qa-wg/2003Jan/att-0007/ 
>> 01-QAWGTTF.html>
>
> I would suggest that we not point to this document (a 1st rough  
> draft).  We agreed to changes at Seattle that will improve the focus,  
> specificity, and tone.  Dimitris is going to incorporate the changes   
> The item is not yet in the AI list, but see 8-jan PM draft minutes  
> [1].  The apparent due date is 29 January.
>
> Dimitris, would you be able to have the new draft earlier, if the  
> topic were to be referenced in the Member newsletter?
>
> Cheers,
> -Lofton.
>
> [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-qa-wg/2003Jan/0026.html
>
Received on Monday, 13 January 2003 20:55:29 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.30 : Thursday, 9 June 2005 12:13:12 GMT