- From: Patrick Curran <Patrick.Curran@sun.com>
- Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2003 17:49:03 -0800
- To: W3C QAWG <www-qa-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <3E5EC00F.2000501@sun.com>
OK - I'm getting the hang of this, and will now only distribute the
"all.htm" file. I presume that all of you can either turn this into
slides, or simply review it as is.
We're running out of time here, and I'd like to wrap this up by the end
of day tomorrow (Friday).While there's always room for improvement, I
think that this is getting close to "good enough".
Some specific questions:
* Are we happy with the last two bullets on slide 1 ("Even a small
investment pays big dividends" ... "DOM, SOAP, SVG Working Groups have
demonstrated this")? Should we add UAAG to this list, since they're on
our Success Stories slide?
* How about the Success Stories slide? I provided a single link to each
of three WGs' activities. Does this slide make sense? Could we add more
links (eg DOM?) If so, please send suggestions. Is this slide redundant
with the last bullet of the previous slide? (It does add more data -
specifically, indicating the area where we think there's something worth
looking at.)
* I added a "Test Guidelines" slide. Do we want to keep it? Reword it?
* Can anybody suggest addional links for the References slide? I will
remove the "What else" when we agree that this is complete.
Of course, you should all feel free to make additional suggestions for
improvement.
Thanks...
PS: a procedural issue. We talked about producing "Quick Tips" in
addition to this presentation. Did we decide on how to publish them? (If
so, we should probably reference them, and link to them, from this
presentation.) If we are going to publish them, we might want to review
them to make sure the message they send is consistent with the message
this presentation sends, and modify them or this, or both if they aren't
consistent.
Attachments
- text/html attachment: all.htm
Received on Thursday, 27 February 2003 20:50:10 UTC