W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-qa-wg@w3.org > February 2003

Re: Revised outreach presentation outline

From: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2003 14:15:21 -0700
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20030227134759.02649120@rockynet.com>
To: Patrick Curran <Patrick.Curran@sun.com>
Cc: www-qa-wg@w3.org

At 06:08 PM 2/26/03 -0800, Patrick Curran wrote:
>My responses to your comments are embedded.
>
>[...]
>>
>>I have one overall question:  do you anticipate to apply the W3C slide 
>>maker once the content is all settled?  (Or is this to be left to The 
>>Outreach Five?).
>
>Yes - I certainly hope to use the slide-maker (or at least, to try it 
>sufficiently far in advance to let you know that if I have trouble with it)


Actually, the important thing is to have all.html.

Outreach 5:  can anyone NOT process all.html into slides?

>[...]
>>
>>>* Results
>>>
>>>   @@SOAP assertion list@@
>>>     (http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/WD-soap12-testcollection-20020626)
>>>
>>>
>>>NOTES
>>>
>>>We talked about the value of providing some real-world examples of the 
>>>successful
>>>application of our guidelines. I haven't received any suggestions for 
>>>content.
>>>Does this belong on a separate slide?
>>
>>
>>I like the idea of a separate slide.  I, as a presenter, would view it as 
>>optional.  Depending on the audience, I might just say "We have some 
>>interesting early results, ..." and skip to the next slide.
>>
>>Lynne's example of UAWG SpecGL "AA" conformance (almost "AAA") would be 
>>excellent here.
>>
>>But that still leaves us a little "thin".
>"Results" doesn't necessarily have to be in the form of "this group 
>reached AA conformance". In fact, I was thinking more of actual examples 
>of the application of good practice, such as the SOAP assertion list. 
>Maybe "Examples" would be a better title? It would also be good to point 
>to a test suite with a harness (SVG?),

Here are some links:

[1] http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/Test/  (SVG TS home page)
[2] http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/Test/Overview-10.html (SVG 1.0 TS page)
[3] http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/Test/svgTest-manual.htm#HowtoDoIt
[4] http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/Test/svgTest-manual.htm#TestReviewGuidelines
[5] http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/Test/20011026/1st-readme-20011026.html

You can actually find everything from [1].  But [2] is what I worked on and 
built (new person built the 1.1 TS, [1], and the whole philosophy, 
orginazation, and technologies is heavily revised.)

[2] has good links to the several TS harnesses for the 1.0 test 
suite.  Also has links to the Release Notes (and TS installation 
instructions) [5].  Also has links to "The Manual", which has a couple of 
interesting chapters:  The chapter at [4] is a test case review and 
evaluation procedure (or rather, a set of review criteria); chapter at [5] 
is a description of how to write a test case (I guess we had potential 
external contributors in mind here).

Not that I think that these things are necessarily "application of good 
practice".  Maybe "precursor to good practice" is more accurate!

-Lofton.
Received on Thursday, 27 February 2003 16:14:58 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.30 : Thursday, 9 June 2005 12:13:12 GMT