W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-qa-wg@w3.org > February 2003

a question about LC comments

From: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>
Date: Wed, 05 Feb 2003 08:00:21 -0700
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20030205075211.03aad0b0@rockynet.com>
To: www-qa-wg@w3.org

The Status sections of OpsGL and SpecGL say, effectively, "please use the 
form, or if you are for some reason unable to use the form, please send 
email to www-qa@w3.org".

Oliver's form will nicely send or put the issue, in XML markup form, 
somewhere for the issue editors.  The issue editors will integrate those 
individual issues into the cumulative Last Call Issues List.

Question.  How will we keep the IG list informed of issues being raised, if 
the issues are no longer sent by originator as email to the IG list?

Proposal.  Similar to what we have done about internally raised issues 
within QAWG, we can send a message to IG list indicating that issues(s) 
have been raised and entered into the issues list.  In the past we have 
forwarded the originating WG issue message as part of the 
notification.  What I would propose instead is to send a message 
periodically to the IG list, with the one-line description of the issue, 
and a link to the Last Call Issues List.

How does this sound?

-Lofton.
Received on Wednesday, 5 February 2003 09:57:28 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.30 : Thursday, 9 June 2005 12:13:12 GMT