W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-qa-wg@w3.org > August 2003

Re: RE : Cc/pp S&V conformance section

From: Lynne Rosenthal <lynne.rosenthal@nist.gov>
Date: Tue, 05 Aug 2003 13:57:29 -0400
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20030805135718.01e7bb48@mailserver.nist.gov>
To: Luu Tran <Luu.Tran@Sun.COM>
Cc: boyera stephane <boyera@w3.org>, www-qa-wg@w3.org, "'W3C DIWG'" <w3c-di-wg@w3.org>

Looks good.

Thanks
Lynne

At 12:58 PM 8/5/2003, Luu Tran wrote:
>Hi Lynne,
>
>Thanks for your comments [1].  We've given this some further thought, and 
>we propose to change the wording in [2] as follows:
>
>1. Conformant: a CC/PP consumer can claim to be a 'CC/PP 1.0 conformant 
>consumer' if it accepts any valid CC/PP profile and extracts information 
>from it.
>
>2. Validating: a CC/PP consumer can claim to be a 'CC/PP 1.0 conformant 
>validating consumer' if it is conformant and if it rejects all invalid 
>CC/PP profiles.
>
>Does that look ok?
>
>Thanks,
>Luu
>
>[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-di-wg/2003Jul/0186.html
>[2] http://www.w3.org/TR/CCPP-struct-vocab/#ConformanceConsumer
>
>
Received on Tuesday, 5 August 2003 13:57:45 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.30 : Thursday, 9 June 2005 12:13:14 GMT