W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-qa-wg@w3.org > August 2003

Re: RE : Cc/pp S&V conformance section

From: Luu Tran <Luu.Tran@Sun.COM>
Date: Tue, 05 Aug 2003 09:58:23 -0700
To: Lynne Rosenthal <lynne.rosenthal@nist.gov>
Cc: boyera stephane <boyera@w3.org>, www-qa-wg@w3.org, "'W3C DIWG'" <w3c-di-wg@w3.org>
Message-id: <3F2FE22F.4000605@sun.com>

Hi Lynne,

Thanks for your comments [1].  We've given this some further thought, 
and we propose to change the wording in [2] as follows:

1. Conformant: a CC/PP consumer can claim to be a 'CC/PP 1.0 conformant 
consumer' if it accepts any valid CC/PP profile and extracts information 
from it.

2. Validating: a CC/PP consumer can claim to be a 'CC/PP 1.0 conformant 
validating consumer' if it is conformant and if it rejects all invalid 
CC/PP profiles.

Does that look ok?


[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-di-wg/2003Jul/0186.html
[2] http://www.w3.org/TR/CCPP-struct-vocab/#ConformanceConsumer
Received on Tuesday, 5 August 2003 12:58:29 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.30 : Thursday, 9 June 2005 12:13:14 GMT