W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-qa-wg@w3.org > April 2003

Re: Draft Minutes of 14-April-2003 Teleconference

From: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2003 18:11:18 -0600
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20030417180348.03c07140@terminal.rockynet.com>
To: Mark Skall <mark.skall@nist.gov>, www-qa-wg@w3.org

I'm updating the issues list, and need a clarification...

At 09:46 AM 4/16/03 -0400, Mark Skall wrote:
>[...]
>Issues 16 and 39  Section 8.4  Consistent handling of discretionary 
>choices.  Comments asked that "document the identified policies" be 
>clarified and the need to make it simpler.  This checkpoint has a history 
>of being rewritten.  It seems to be a difficult concept to describe clearly.
>
>Alternatives:
>
>1. try again and rewrite
>2. delete the checkpoint
>3. leave as is.
>
>LR: This checkpoint needs to be clarified.  It's not clear what the 
>conformance requirement is.
>
>SM: The key phrase is "identify documented policies"  What do we mean by this?
>
>DM (with Dom and Lofton) will re-write the conformance requirement and 
>checkpoint for 8.4 (Action Item)  Date:4/25/03.

I recall advocating/discussing that we would try to achieve a simple 
clarification that everyone is happy with, and failing that would remove 
the checkpoint.  I.e.:  Draft clarification; review; accept or delete.

Is this something that we agreed as part of the Resolution?

-Lofton.
Received on Thursday, 17 April 2003 20:09:30 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.30 : Thursday, 9 June 2005 12:13:13 GMT