W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-qa-wg@w3.org > April 2003

Re: Draft Minutes of 14-April-2003 Teleconference

From: Lynne Rosenthal <lynne.rosenthal@nist.gov>
Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2003 08:42:58 -0400
Message-Id: <>
To: www-qa-wg@w3.org

That is what we said.


At 08:11 PM 4/17/2003, you wrote:

>I'm updating the issues list, and need a clarification...
>At 09:46 AM 4/16/03 -0400, Mark Skall wrote:
>>Issues 16 and 39  Section 8.4  Consistent handling of discretionary 
>>choices.  Comments asked that "document the identified policies" be 
>>clarified and the need to make it simpler.  This checkpoint has a history 
>>of being rewritten.  It seems to be a difficult concept to describe clearly.
>>1. try again and rewrite
>>2. delete the checkpoint
>>3. leave as is.
>>LR: This checkpoint needs to be clarified.  It's not clear what the 
>>conformance requirement is.
>>SM: The key phrase is "identify documented policies"  What do we mean by 
>>DM (with Dom and Lofton) will re-write the conformance requirement and 
>>checkpoint for 8.4 (Action Item)  Date:4/25/03.
>I recall advocating/discussing that we would try to achieve a simple 
>clarification that everyone is happy with, and failing that would remove 
>the checkpoint.  I.e.:  Draft clarification; review; accept or delete.
>Is this something that we agreed as part of the Resolution?
Received on Friday, 18 April 2003 08:43:23 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:14:30 UTC