- From: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>
- Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2002 11:55:53 -0600
- To: Lynne Rosenthal <lynne.rosenthal@nist.gov>
- Cc: www-qa-wg@w3.org
At 01:09 PM 10/16/02 -0400, Lynne Rosenthal wrote: >My minutes from the F2F indicates that we agreed to 1 hour meetings, >although we would reserve a 1.5 hour time slot. I remembered it as a goal, not as a hard limit. >This extra half hour could be used to summarize and conclude the telcon >(in case we are running late) and/or by editors for an editor's telcon > >I have a Monday commitment at 12 (Eastern time), so will only be able to >participate for the scheduled 1 hour. I did not understand that you and Mark always cannot stay beyond 12. I think that I would have chosen one of the other couple of options otherwise. This constrains us to *less* f2f time (all together) than we have been using. What about shifting the start time 1/2 hour sooner: 10:30 Eastern (7:30 Pacific)? It is not as quite good for west coast, but on the other hand, we're not trapped into less telecon time than we have been using. Would 10:30 Eastern by unworkable for anyone? -Lofton.
Received on Wednesday, 16 October 2002 13:54:33 UTC