W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-qa-wg@w3.org > October 2002

Re: Documents to read Guidebook

From: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>
Date: Wed, 02 Oct 2002 17:08:08 -0600
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20021002170225.03387600@rockynet.com>
To: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>, www-qa-wg@w3.org

Karl, et al --

The referenced http://www.w3.org/Guide/LastCall relates to topics we were 
discussing this morning, and topics which we will discuss next Tuesday 
morning in Tokyo.  See especially #2 in the numbered list near the beginning.

"...which W3C Working Groups and other parties should review the last call 
draft".  It would seem to me that this includes almost all WGs, right? If 
the GL documents are to be mandatory, then don't they significantly affect 
all WGs?

In other words, in the 3 months after Tokyo, before Last Call, this seems 
to say that we need to get a commitment to review from *every* WG?

-Lofton.

At 01:01 PM 10/1/02 -0400, Karl Dubost wrote:

>Dear Members of the QA WG,
>
>something to read :)
>http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/chairs/2002OctDec/0001.html (Member 
>only) :(
>
>
>
>--
>Karl Dubost / W3C - Conformance Manager
>           http://www.w3.org/QA/
>
>      --- Be Strict To Be Cool! ---
>
Received on Wednesday, 2 October 2002 19:06:42 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.30 : Thursday, 9 June 2005 12:13:11 GMT