W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-qa-wg@w3.org > November 2002

Re: lost SpecGL requirement(s)?

From: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2002 12:04:59 -0700
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20021112120357.03a495f0@rockynet.com>
To: John.Robert.Gardner@Sun.COM
Cc: www-qa-wg@w3.org

Hi JR,

Thanks for the feedback...

At 01:39 PM 11/12/02 -0500, Johnrobert Gardner wrote:
>[...]
>I'm filling in for Jack until we can scope our partic from our 
>QA-chartered internal org's.  I'm trying to get up to speed here on the 
>reading, so please bear with me as my role popped up hear a little 
>unexpectedly.
>
>Re. below, however, I wanted to weigh in and suggest that I hope it was 
>only the latter contingency Lofton makes, that use cases were 
>"unitentional casualties" and, by implication, will be returned to the 
>requirements.  It is very important these are retained ...

To update you and the rest of the QAWG...

I had a bit of off-list discussion with the other editors, and we agreed it 
was an "unintentional casualty".  There will probably be a suggested 
correction circulated sometime in the next couple of weeks.

-Lofton.


>Lofton Henderson wrote:
> >
> > QAWG --
> >
> > It appears that we may have inadvertently dropped some explicit conformance
> > requirements in the new (20021108) SpecGL version [1].  Referring to the
> > 20020826 version, for example checkpoint 3.1 ([2]) said:
> >
> > "[...]the specification must explain why profiles are necessary, by
> > reference to use cases and/or project requirements."
> >
> > Such a requirement was repeated for several other of the DoV (for modules
> > and levels, at least).
> >
> > Did we discuss dropping these requirements? (If yes, can someone point to
> > the decision?)
> >
> > Or, was this an unintentional casualty of SpecGL reorganization?  (In
> > CK13.4 there is allusion in the 3rd bullet to the requirement to be able to
> > navigate to some statements, but we don't actually have requirements for
> > the statements anywhere else -- in this sense, the 3rd bullet is different
> > from all the others).
> >
> > -Lofton.
> >
> > [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/WD-qaframe-spec-20021108/
> > [2]
> > 
> http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/WD-qaframe-spec-20020826/#Ck-choose-profile-grouping
>
>--
>=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-|
>John Robert Gardner                     |
>Business Management                     |
>Technology Office, IT                   |
>Sun Microsystems Inc., UBUR02-306       |
>1 Network Drive                         |
>Burlington, MA  01803-0903              |
>Ph. 781-730-4012/#6-9482 fax 442-1539   |
>e-mail  john.robert.gardner@sun.com     |
>----------------------------------------|
>Calendar: http://cal.central.sun.com/?calid=jg113402&security=1
>http://vedavid.org/diss/
>OPINIONS AND VIEWS NOT NECESSARILY THOSE OF SUN MICROSYSTEMS, ET AL
Received on Tuesday, 12 November 2002 14:04:25 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.30 : Thursday, 9 June 2005 12:13:11 GMT