W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-qa-wg@w3.org > March 2002

Re: Mark's comments on Checkpoint 1.1 Table

From: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2002 12:08:53 -0700
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20020322120809.054e7b50@rockynet.com>
To: Mark Skall <mark.skall@nist.gov>, www-qa-wg@w3.org
Comment in two parts...

Comment part 1:
=========

At 03:57 PM 3/11/02 -0500, Mark Skall wrote:
>[...]
>Again, if we believe it is a requirement, I believe, we need to state 
>it.  Part of our mission is education.  Test assertions are a mandatory 
>and necessary condition for the development of a good test suite.

[...moot, we discussed in telcon...]

Comment part 2.
=========

Please add to the Glossary:

test assertion
test requirement
semantic requirement
test purpose
test case
atomic test
...(any others of this ilk?)...
(molecular test -- an interesting term proposed by David)

Thanks,
-Lofton.
Received on Friday, 22 March 2002 14:08:33 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.30 : Thursday, 9 June 2005 12:13:09 GMT