Re: Mark's comments on Checkpoint 1.1 Table

Comment in two parts...

Comment part 1:
=========

At 03:57 PM 3/11/02 -0500, Mark Skall wrote:
>[...]
>Again, if we believe it is a requirement, I believe, we need to state 
>it.  Part of our mission is education.  Test assertions are a mandatory 
>and necessary condition for the development of a good test suite.

[...moot, we discussed in telcon...]

Comment part 2.
=========

Please add to the Glossary:

test assertion
test requirement
semantic requirement
test purpose
test case
atomic test
...(any others of this ilk?)...
(molecular test -- an interesting term proposed by David)

Thanks,
-Lofton.