W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-qa-wg@w3.org > March 2002

Re: [DRAFT] 21-March-2002 QA Working Group Teleconference

From: Olivier Thereaux <ot@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2002 12:24:10 +0900
To: www-qa-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <20020322032410.GB12902@w3.mag.keio.ac.jp>
Karl, thanks for these minutes. 
A few comments/corrections inline

On Thu, Mar 21, 2002, Karl Dubost wrote:
> KD: About a week in QA
> http://www.w3.org/QA/2002/02/aweekinqa/
> 	It seems very difficult to motivate people to participate to 
> this review.

Yes, that's too bad, I hope we can get the interest to raise once the
"project" starts.
 
> * Being a moderator/writer: When Karl Dubost be a reviewer, Olivier Théreaux

Proposed rewording (your sentence seems a bit strange to me):
"In order to ensure impartiality, OT will take over as a moderator when
KD is the writer".
 
> Checkpoint 5.3.
> KG: two kind of license  vendro submitted test materials, publisher 

vendor

> Checkpoint 5.4.
> MS/LR: Priority 2 because you have to explain why you
don't remember the end of this sentence, either. Lynne?

 
> Checkpoint 6.2.
> LR: We are all agree.
s/are//

 
> Checkpoint 6.3.
> In the QA Process document, describe how the test materials will be 
> published and point to the corresponding web page. [Priority 2]
> Kyrill: remove the checkpoint.
> Discussion
> LR: It's strongly recommended to not publish in TR space.

Did we decide, in the end, to remove the checkpoint?

Thanks,
-- 
Olivier 
Received on Thursday, 21 March 2002 22:25:16 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.30 : Thursday, 9 June 2005 12:13:09 GMT