W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-qa-wg@w3.org > July 2002

new SpecGL editors draft

From: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2002 11:31:58 -0600
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20020723110730.04214130@rockynet.com>
To: www-qa-wg@w3.org

QAWG participants --

There is a new QAWG editors draft at [1], for discussion during the 7/24 
telecon.  This has not progressed much since the previous (8-july) draft, 
but the few results of the 10-july telecon and subsequent email have been 
included.  I propose that we should continue the informal approach of 
looking at "@@" flagged issues in the text.  Here are some highlights:

[note new Sec 1.3, new description of checkpoint priorities.]

Sec 1.6 (was 1.5):  extent of inter-dimension discussion?

CK1.2:  'normative use case' definition (Issue #72)

CK2.3:  minimal requirements for each class of product

CK3.4:  minimal requirements for profiles

GL.4: modules/profiles example(s); modules/levels verbiage?

CK4.3:  verify result, after GL.3,4,7 split.

CK4.4:  goodness criteria for modules/levels?

GL.5:  excessive variability caveat?

CK6.3:  verify separate checkpoint

GL.7:  minimal requirement language; profiles, modules verbiage?

CK7.3, 7.4 (former):  rationale for their elimination?

GL.8:  new ckpt about "explain impl dependent"?

CK9.5:  checkpoint challenged during project review.

CK10.1:  distinction from 10.2?

CK10.3:  is 1st sentence actually 10.4?

CK11.1:  clarify "levels"; fix example

CK13.3:  missing reference

CK15.1, 15.2:  status footnote; needed links.

That's all,
-Lofton.

[1] http://www.w3.org/QA/WG/2002/07/qaframe-spec-0722.html
Received on Tuesday, 23 July 2002 13:29:07 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.30 : Thursday, 9 June 2005 12:13:10 GMT