W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-qa-wg@w3.org > January 2002

RE: Fwd: Re: Issue #22

From: Lynne Rosenthal <lynne.rosenthal@nist.gov>
Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2002 18:53:21 -0500
To: "'Lofton Henderson'" <lofton@rockynet.com>, <danield@w3.org>
Cc: <www-qa-wg@w3.org>, <ij@w3.org>
Message-ID: <001301c197d6$b574a2c0$061f0681@9tys201>
That would be fine - to move the information to the web site as a resource
guide.

-----Original Message-----
From: www-qa-wg-request@w3.org [mailto:www-qa-wg-request@w3.org]On
Behalf Of Lofton Henderson
Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 05:41 PM
To: danield@w3.org
Cc: lynne rosenthal; www-qa-wg@w3.org; ij@w3.org
Subject: Re: Fwd: Re: Issue #22


At 12:30 PM 1/7/02 +0100, Daniel Dardailler wrote:

> > But what it seems to reduce to is:  Should the Introduction be an
> > introduction to the Framework documents alone?  Or, to the QA Activity
as
>
>My vote goes to an Intro for the Framework only, with a bit of QA
>context but not the whole explanation like now. So I agree with Ian
>and Lynne that most of section 2 should (and is already in fact) go on
>the site.

All comments support removing Ch.2, and having Intro be an introduction to
the Framework documents only.

Does everyone also support Ian's specific suggestion ([1]) to put it on the
Web site as a resource introduction or resource guide?

-Lofton.

[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-qa/2002Jan/0001.html
Received on Monday, 7 January 2002 18:54:48 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.30 : Thursday, 9 June 2005 12:13:08 GMT