W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-qa-wg@w3.org > February 2002

RE: Test Suites in TR space

From: Kirill Gavrylyuk <kirillg@microsoft.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2002 21:19:27 -0800
Message-ID: <B3F0DACD72892E4DB7E8296C6C9FC2F602B7FE10@red-msg-03.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
To: "Karl Dubost" <karl@w3.org>, <www-qa-wg@w3.org>
FWIW, there was a discussion on this list prior FPWD and corresponding
sentence is already in the Procs&Ops as a Note to the Checkpoint 6.6. If
a test suite is to be published on w3c site, we recommend to publish it
in the Activity Domain.

-Kirill
-----Original Message-----
From: Karl Dubost [mailto:karl@w3.org] 
Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2002 8:24 AM
To: www-qa-wg@w3.org
Subject: Test Suites in TR space


The XML Protocol [1] asked me if they could publish the Test Suite 
[2] in the TR space as a WD or at least as a Note.

I said that it may not be a good idea and I preferred that until QA 
WG has strongly defined a rule, I prefer that it should only be a 
webpage on the W3C website, and they can link from their Rec to the 
test suite.

Lofton and I think that we need to define strong arguments in favor 
or against TR/ space publishing.
	- Updates of the Test Suite
	- erratas
	- External status (marketing, deployment)

One argument of the XMLP WG is to say that it will be easier to say 
it's important if it's in the TR space.

So it leverages the question, What status for Primers, Tutorials and
Guides.


[1] http://www.w3.org/2000/xp/Group/
[2] http://www.w3.org/2000/xp/Group/1/09/ts.html

-- 
Karl Dubost / W3C - Conformance Manager
           http://www.w3.org/QA/

      --- Be Strict To Be Cool! ---
Received on Wednesday, 27 February 2002 00:40:24 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.30 : Thursday, 9 June 2005 12:13:09 GMT