W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-qa-wg@w3.org > December 2002

Re: Monday (16 Dec) QAWG telecon agenda

From: Andrew Thackrah <andrew@opengroup.org>
Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2002 15:35:16 +0000
To: www-qa-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <20021216153516.A13930@hyperion>


> Agenda
> =====

> 3.) OpsGL leftovers
>         - CP6.1 proposal okay? (default: yes) [2a]
>         - CP4.6 proposal okay? (default: yes) [2b]
>         - issue 59 [2c]

  Before the telcon,
  here are a few comments on [2c] (test material licensing)

  Checkpoint says
  >> WG MUST define ... at least one license that is agreeable to the WG.

  This implies that the WG has restrictions/requirements on licenses. Are 
these
  published anywhere? We should try to help the readers of OpsGL by linking
  to this so they can avoid all the usual pitfalls.

  E.g. It seems that materials must be freely available, but how about 
freely usable?
  Availability can be quantified. Source or binary only, platform 
dependent etc?
  I think these details are out of our scope but if someone has already 
worked this
  out we should reference a definitive guide rather than just link to 
examples.

-ADT

> [2c] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-qa-wg/2002Dec/0078.html
Received on Monday, 16 December 2002 10:37:02 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.30 : Thursday, 9 June 2005 12:13:12 GMT