- From: Lynne Rosenthal <lynne.rosenthal@nist.gov>
- Date: Wed, 04 Dec 2002 08:51:09 -0500
- To: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>, Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>, www-qa-wg@w3.org
I also am a bit confused. We agreed that the SpecGL should have an ICS and I think that the Checklist with some additions could serve that purpose. However, I think Karl's wording may fit in nicely for how to specify claims to the SpecGL. Lynne At 06:38 PM 12/3/2002, Lofton Henderson wrote: >I have one question about this... > >At 05:06 PM 12/3/02 -0500, Karl Dubost wrote: >>[...] >>Just a proposed wording and solution, I don't know if it makes sense. >> >>The QA Framework: Specification Guidelines Specification does not comply >>itself to the Guideline 12. Publish an Implementation Conformance >>Statement proforma. > >Isn't the Spec-Checklist (which is linked from SpecGL), > >http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/WD-qaframe-spec-20021108/qaframe-spec-checklist.html > >an ICS pro-forma for SpecGL? The introduction says: > >"...intended to be convenient for organizers and evaluators of QA projects >in W3C Working Groups, to facilitate assessing specifications against the >checkpoints. The table includes spaces for scoring each checkpoint, "yes" >(satisfied), "no" (not satisfied), "n/a" (not applicable)." > >Regards, >-Lofton. > > > >>* CP 12.1 >>I propose something done on the example of UAAG 1.0. >> >>*************************** >><p>On [Date], [Specification X] [Status] ([URI]) conforms to <acronym >>title="World Wide Web Consortium">W3C</acronym>'s "<acronym >>title="Quality Assurance">QA</acronym> Framework: Specification >>Guidelines", http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/WD-qaframe-spec-20021108/. >>Conformance level: <a href="QA-checklist.html">[Level-of-Conformance]</a>. </p> >> >>* CP 12.2 >>And put it in the 3.2 Conformance definition of QA Framework: >>Specification Guidelines >>with modification of the wording of this section. >> >>A specification conforms to this document by satisfying the following >>requirements. >> 1. The specification has reached one of the three levels of >> Conformance. >> 2. The claim of QA conformance is included in the status section >> of the specification as defined in the sample conformance claim. >> 3. The list of checkpoints covered by the specification itself >> in a specific file QA-checklist.html >>************************* >> >>The 3rd item is to make clear that people didn't apply to a checkpoint >>because it was not necessary. >> >> >>-- >>Karl Dubost / W3C - Conformance Manager >> http://www.w3.org/QA/ >> >> --- Be Strict To Be Cool! ---
Received on Wednesday, 4 December 2002 08:58:33 UTC