W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-qa-wg@w3.org > August 2002

sign up for Techniques Analysis

From: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2002 18:23:07 -0600
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20020828145708.03869ec0@rockynet.com>
To: www-qa-wg@w3.org

QAWG members --

Per last week's telecon Action Items...

"AI-20020821-6 LH to write ground rules for techniques analysis review and 
call for sign ups."

Here is my proposal.

Okay, we have three GL documents and 10 QAWG members.  That means three 
contributors per GL document, plus one extra.

OpsGL:  3 volunteers needed
SpecGL:  3 volunteers needed
TestGL:  3 volunteers needed

If you want to chose your GL, then write to Dominique (dom@w3.org) and 
please Cc: the QAWG (so that we're all aware what's being chosen).  Dom 
will enter your choice (OpsGL or SpecGL or TestGL) into the last column of 
your row of the reviews matrix [1].  Except if there are already three 
signed up for that GL document, then you will get a "sorry" in reply 
(choose again).  In fact, you should check [1] before you send your message 
to Dom, to be sure that there aren't already three signed up for your GL 
document.

If you don't choose by the next telecon (4 Sept), then the chairs will 
assign the remaining people to GL documents.

Questions or comments?

(I haven't thought it through yet, about if or how the three should work 
together on a GL document.  Divide the checkpoints?  Each person do all 
checkpoints?  Other?  But however, each person will have a contribution 
towards an Extech document.)

-Lofton.

[1] http://www.w3.org/QA/Group/2002/06/reviews
Received on Wednesday, 28 August 2002 20:22:40 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.30 : Thursday, 9 June 2005 12:13:10 GMT