W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-qa-wg@w3.org > August 2002

wording "strict conformance"

From: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2002 18:00:26 -0600
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20020815175313.03984920@rockynet.com>
To: www-qa-wg@w3.org

I need a little help clarifying some wording...

Reference:
http://www.w3.org/QA/WG/2002/08/qaframe-spec-0811#Ck-clarify-strict

It says:

"Either use the definition provided above (@@link) (or in the QA Glossary 
[QA-GLOSSARY]), modify it, or provide your own definition (@@really?!). It 
is strongly recommended that the definition given above be used to ensure 
consistency across WGs and promote a common understanding of conformance 
requirements."

What about "...provide your own definition"?  Why do we say that?  What is 
an example/scenario where it would make sense?

-Lofton.
Received on Thursday, 15 August 2002 20:00:15 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.30 : Thursday, 9 June 2005 12:13:10 GMT