- From: Jonas Sicking <sicking@bigfoot.com>
- Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2001 03:07:35 +0200
- To: <www-patentpolicy-comment@w3.org>
I can't really say that I have any new arguments to add to this discussion, but I still want to express my opinion on the matter. To continue to enhance the web-experience and strengthen the power of the web we need to make sure that the standards used by the web get widely accessible for end-users. To make sure that this happens standards needs to be widely implemented, the wider the better. If there is even a small change to implement a standard this will be a big obstacle for many implementers. Even the fact that a standard *may* be charged for in the future will make implementers think twice before implementing such a standard since it might be lost time if they have to remove that implementation later. Looking at the implementers of Candidate Recommendations so far you see that it's often, if not mostly, done by smaller implementers. It would most likely slow down development of standards if these implementers would have to pay patent fees (even in the future). And I don't think the solution "make everything free for open source software" is the right way to go either. W3C standards should be freely implemented by *anyone*, no matter what religion. I see use for there being formats out there that contains patented technologies, but why does W3C have to push for such formats? Thanks for listening, Jonas Sicking
Received on Sunday, 30 September 2001 21:03:08 UTC