I think it is a serious mistake for you to consider sanctioning non-royalty-free standards. Internet standards must be set to _preserve_ openness, not to frustrate it. At the very least, you should require that there always be royalty-free alternatives to any licensed technology before you adopt it as a standard. You are the best-placed institution to preserve and protect the Internet against potentially crippling licensing fees, by refusing to accept fee-based technologies as Internet standards. Only then will companies which wish their technologies to become standard remain willing, in order to get your stamp of approval, to allow use of those technologies without payment of royalties. Please resist this "corporatization" of the Internet. Sincerely, Patrick WisemanReceived on Sunday, 30 September 2001 16:21:24 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 April 2010 00:13:39 GMT