W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-patentpolicy-comment@w3.org > September 2001

RAND is problematic

From: Kevin Corlette <kevin_corlette@yahoo.com>
Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2001 12:35:24 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <20010930193524.11874.qmail@web10402.mail.yahoo.com>
To: www-patentpolicy-comment@w3.org
The first point in "W3C in 7 points" asserts that the
"universe [of network-accessible information] benefits
society by enabling new forms of communication and
opportunities to share knowledge.  One of W3C's
primary
goals is to make these benefits available to
all people, whatever their hardware, software, network
infrastructure, native language, culture, geographical
location, or physical or mental ability."   This
proposal flies in the face of this goal. A RAND
license
is discriminatory (despite the Orwellian use of the
word "Non-Discriminatory") because it restricts
availability of the means of communication to those
who
are capable of paying. The whole point of a patent is
to allow the holder to discriminate between those who
can make use of it and those who can't.  How
does the establishment of a standard based on
patent-encumbered technology contribute to
Universal Access?

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Listen to your Yahoo! Mail messages from any phone.
http://phone.yahoo.com
Received on Sunday, 30 September 2001 15:35:26 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 April 2010 00:13:39 GMT