- From: Archfeld Serethai <archfeld@hotmail.com>
- Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2001 18:42:07 +0000
- To: www-patentpolicy-comment@w3.org
Under NO CIRCUMSTANCES should a fee based proccess be considered as a standard. If a compnay that has the TM/PAtent/IP of the standard could make it available royalty free so be it, but to force the industry to pay homage to aparticular vendor is sillyt, and I can point to 1394 as a perfect example. It is a MUCH BETTER standard but has failed to be implemented due to licensing charges. Onbly a SONY or APPLE machine will come with 1394 native, and the rest of the insudtry is STILL USING USB, a MUCH SLOWER but FREE standard. *Forced by a previous life of sin to use HOTMAIL as penance* archfeld@hotmail.com ICQ# 6740411 Life is a waste of time, time is a waste of life, so get wasted all of the time and have the time of your life. -- Michelle Mastrolacasa -- _________________________________________________________________ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp
Received on Sunday, 30 September 2001 14:42:38 UTC