- From: Chavous P. Camp <cpc@sccltd.net>
- Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2001 13:56:07 -0400
- To: <www-patentpolicy-comment@w3.org>
A quick addendum to my comment... It was brought to my attention that I misrepresented the Netcraft survey... Sixty percent of HOSTNAMES that provide an http service that they polled used Apache, not necessarily 60% of the physical number of SERVERS. This does not change my argument in the slightest. Thank you, Chavous P. Camp ----------------------------------------------------------- Chavous P. Camp Salter & Camp Consultants, Ltd. Co. cpc@scconsultants.net (803) 551-5711 (208) 207-0204 fax Internet Application Development ----------------------------------------------------------- -----Original Message----- From: Chavous P. Camp [mailto:cpc@sccltd.net] Sent: Sunday, September 30, 2001 1:21 PM To: www-patentpolicy-comment@w3.org Subject: W3C Patent Policy Hi, I think that the W3C incorporating a "non-discriminatory" license to patents does just the opposite - Lets take a look at open source, shall we? According to a Netcraft survey (http://www.netcraft.com/survey/) taken in July 2001, 60% of the internet's web servers STILL RUN APACHE. The reasons for this? It is fast, cheap, and secure. The reason it is all three of these is it is OPEN SOURCE. If the W3C began considering patented technology for standards, and incorporated those standards into core web systems (example: secure, uncopyable web page) then, if that technology uses some server-side component, Apache, the LONG TIME leader in web servers, would be LEFT OUT IN THE COLD and hence, discriminated against. Granted, that may the whole point for this move - the authors are from some of the largest IT companies in the US - Microsoft (well, their IP law firm), Apple Computer, and HP. That's fine. It is also counter to the goals of the W3C. (quoting from http://www.w3.org/Consortium/#goals) "W3C's long term goals for the Web are: 1) Universal Access: To make the Web accessible to all by promoting technologies that take into account the vast differences in culture, education, ability, material resources, and physical limitations of users on all continents; 2) Semantic Web : To develop a software environment that permits each user to make the best use of the resources available on the Web; 3) Web of Trust : To guide the Web's development with careful consideration for the novel legal, commercial, and social issues raised by this technology." So unless the W3C wants to become a hypocrisy and a joke, either this proposal has to go, or the original goals have to go. I'd hate to see the goals change. W3C has provided an amazing service to the web community, and if its goals change, I'm afraid that service would cease to exist. Don't get me wrong - I am a small business owner and as a small business owner I understand the value of intellectual property as much as if not more than a large company. If my business model is based on my IP, then with it I make money, without it, I fall into the (if I'm not mistaken) 95% of companies that close their doors within the first five years of existence. HOWEVER, I don't think that STANDARDS should be based on patented technologies unless the patent owner freely licenses it to anyone who uses the standard. Thank you, Chavous P. Camp ----------------------------------------------------------- Chavous P. Camp Salter & Camp Consultants, Ltd. Co. cpc@scconsultants.net (803) 551-5711 (208) 207-0204 fax Internet Application Development -----------------------------------------------------------
Received on Sunday, 30 September 2001 13:56:38 UTC