Re: We must fork the SVG standard (was: SVGA 1.0 uses RAND -> DO NOT ! implement it, DO NOT ! use it)

Daniel Phillips wrote:
> 
> On October 7, 2001 09:23 pm, Chris Lilley wrote:
> > Daniel Phillips wrote:
> > > On October 6, 2001 04:11 pm, Chris Lilley wrote:
> > > > You have not shown that SVG is encumbered.
> > >
> > > This document indicates that SVG is encumbered:
> > >
> > >    http://www.w3.org/2001/07/SVG10-IPR-statements.html
> >
> > I get the impression that you are no longer reading what I write. This
> > is sad, since we did seem to be getting somewhere a day or two ago.
> 
> Yes, that was before you made it clear that you see RAND licensing as a
> necessary part of W3C's patent policy.

Really? That is interesting. Can you point to where I said "RAND is
necessary"? I believe I said that it was better than nothing.

-- 
Chris

Received on Monday, 8 October 2001 13:33:07 UTC