W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-patentpolicy-comment@w3.org > October 2001

Re: We must fork the SVG standard (was: SVGA 1.0 uses RAND -> DO NOT ! implement it, DO NOT ! use it)

From: Daniel Phillips <phillips@bonn-fries.net>
Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2001 16:03:45 +0200
To: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
Cc: Jason Antony <jemvai777@yahoo.com.au>, www-patentpolicy-comment@w3.org
Message-Id: <20011008140333Z16225-17200+1489@humbolt.nl.linux.org>
On October 7, 2001 09:23 pm, Chris Lilley wrote:
> Daniel Phillips wrote:
> > On October 6, 2001 04:11 pm, Chris Lilley wrote:
> > > You have not shown that SVG is encumbered.
> > 
> > This document indicates that SVG is encumbered:
> > 
> >    http://www.w3.org/2001/07/SVG10-IPR-statements.html
> 
> I get the impression that you are no longer reading what I write. This
> is sad, since we did seem to be getting somewhere a day or two ago.

Yes, that was before you made it clear that you see RAND licensing as a 
necessary part of W3C's patent policy.

--
Daniel
Received on Monday, 8 October 2001 10:03:40 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 April 2010 00:13:41 GMT