W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-patentpolicy-comment@w3.org > October 2001

[www-patentpolicy-comment] <none>

From: Meg Otto <digitlchic@emailcm.com>
Date: 7 Oct 2001 17:37:50 -0000
Message-ID: <20011007173750.3023.qmail@whiskas.chek.com>
To: www-patentpolicy-comment@w3.org
Dear W3C Patent Policy Working Group,

I'm concerned about the recent Patent Policy Framework draft, which could allow W3C members to charge royalty fees for technologies included in web standards. 

In particular, I object to the inclusion of a "reasonable and non-discriminatory" (RAND) licensing option in the proposed policy. I believe that the exclusive use of a "royalty-free" (RF) licensing model is in the best interests of the Internet community, and that RAND licensing would always necessarily exclude some would-be implementors. 

I applaud the W3C for its tradition of providing open-source reference implementations and its work to promote a wide variety of interoperable implementations of its open standards. The W3C can best continue its work of "leading the Web to its full potential" by continuing this tradition, and saying no to RAND licensing. 


Meg Otto
St. Louis, MO

Signup for your FREE CareerMosaic ResumeMail account and have a chance to win a FREE LapTop at http://www.careermosaic.com
Received on Sunday, 7 October 2001 13:41:39 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:06:44 UTC