Re: Part II: A Concrete Alternative from Glenn Randers-Pehrson on 2001-10-05 (www-patentpolicy-comment@w3.org from October 2001)

From: Glenn Randers-Pehrson <glennrp@home.com>
Date: Fri, 05 Oct 2001 15:51:51 -0400
To: www-patentpolicy-comment@w3.org
Message-Id: <3.0.6.32.20011005155151.00d26100@netmail.home.com>

>From: Steve Waldman <swaldman@mchange.com>
>To: www-patentpolicy-comment@w3.org
>Subject: Part II: A Concrete Alternative
>
>The following is a proposed alternative to the W3C PPF Working Draft

I like Steve's proposal a lot.  Applause....

It does place potentially expensive patent-search requirements on W3C,
but I think that's a good use for dues paid to W3C by its members.

Glenn Randers-Pehrson (PNG, MNG, libpng, pngcrush, ImageMagick)

Received on Friday, 5 October 2001 15:54:40 UTC