W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-patentpolicy-comment@w3.org > October 2001

Re: [www-patentpolicy-comment] <none>

From: WINTER,CHRIS (HP-Sweden,ex1) <chris_winter@hp.com>
Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2001 12:11:27 +0200
Message-ID: <CDB09D386161D411881900D0B77FBBC105549104@ibsen.sweden.hp.com>
To: www-patentpolicy-comment@w3.org

On Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2001 13:38:26 -0400 (EDT), Christopher Hicks wrote:
>In terms of computing technology, the IETF
>stands as a shining example of how to get standards widely implemented.
>The fact that the standards were written by practical engineers instead of
>standards lawyers is certainly one reason for that.   

I am quite sorry to say that a colleague pointed out that,contrary to
popular belief, the IETF actually has adopted a RAND model. 

More information can be read at http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2026.txt.
Especially chapters 6.2 and 10.3 make for quite interesting reading. Given
the fact that IETF has been coined as a success story on standard
implementation by various contributors to the current discussion (who are
zealously opposing RAND style arrangements in the W3C case), plus the fact
that IETF uses a RAND model makes it clear to me that I perhaps should
re-evaluate my position on the matter at hand. 

Kind regards, 

Chris Winter
Received on Friday, 5 October 2001 06:11:36 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 April 2010 00:13:41 GMT