- From: Daniel Weitzner <djweitzner@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2001 15:18:51 -0600
- To: <www-patentpolicy-comment@w3.org>
Following the recent W3C Advisory Committee meeting, the Patent Policy Working Group was given the following action item. An action item to the PPWG: We have heard a continuum of views about what the goal of our patent policy should be: from an exclusively RF policy to one that prefers RF but allows RAND. There is significant support for requiring that all W3C Recommendations have RF licensing. There is also concern from a number of Members that not all W3C Recommendations can be completed without RAND licensing provisions. Based on this input the PPWG should develop as a first priority a process for producing RF Recommendations -- an RF Patent Policy. In recognition of the fact that a number of Members do appear reluctant to abandon a RAND track altogether, the PPWG will offer the AC further discussion of a RAND track with responses to the issues raised here and in the Last Call commments supporting a RAND option. ### Note -- this does NOT mean that W3C has made final decision in favor of a RF-only policy, nor does it mean that we have made a final determination about the role RAND licensing will play. The final decision about W3C's patent policy will be made after the PPWG has developed a new proposal, the public has had another chance to comment, and the W3C membership has had it's chance to express its views formally to the Director. Daniel Weitzner, Chair W3C Patent Policy Working Group
Received on Wednesday, 21 November 2001 16:17:27 UTC