Re: Comments from the CC/PP working group

Very good. If your group will be at the meeting in Boston
in February, perhaps we can schedule some time to
meet together.

Lorrie

----- Original Message -----
From: "Johan Hjelm" <johan.hjelm@era-t.ericsson.se>
To: "Lorrie Cranor" <lorrie@research.att.com>
Cc: <w3c-ccpp-wg@w3.org>; <www-p3p-public-comments@w3.org>
Sent: Wednesday, December 06, 2000 6:47 PM
Subject: Re: Comments from the CC/PP working group


> I think we are satisfied with the response from the P3P working group.
However,
> as previously noted, we look forward to cooperating in future releases to
make
> the two different technologies work together even more smoothly.
>
> Johan
>
> Lorrie Cranor wrote:
>
> > Last August I responded to the comments of
> > the CC/PP working group on P3P
> >
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-p3p-specification/2000Aug/0110.html
> > Having not heard back from your group, I assume
> > you found our response satisfactory, or at least
> > not sufficiently objectionable to continue the
> > discussion at this time. Now that we have submitted
> > our working draft for CR
> > http://www.w3.org/P3P/Group/Specification/Drafts/WD-P3P-20001123a
> >  we have been asked to
> > demonstrate that no other W3C working groups
> > have outstanding concerns about P3P that should
> > be addressed before going to CR. I would appreciate
> > it if you could send a message to
> > www-p3p-public-comments@w3.org
> > confirming that the CC/PP working group has
> > no outstanding concerns about P3P that should
> > be addressed before P3P enters CR.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Lorrie Cranor
> > P3P Specification Working Group Chair
>
> --
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>           Johan Hjelm
> Nippon Ericsson KK, Ericsson Research
>     Applications Research Group
>
>   Read more about my recent book at
>  http://www.wireless-information.net
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>
>
>

Received on Wednesday, 6 December 2000 19:22:55 UTC