- From: Johan Hjelm <johan.hjelm@era-t.ericsson.se>
- Date: Thu, 07 Dec 2000 08:47:55 +0900
- To: Lorrie Cranor <lorrie@research.att.com>
- CC: w3c-ccpp-wg@w3.org, www-p3p-public-comments@w3.org
I think we are satisfied with the response from the P3P working group. However,
as previously noted, we look forward to cooperating in future releases to make
the two different technologies work together even more smoothly.
Johan
Lorrie Cranor wrote:
> Last August I responded to the comments of
> the CC/PP working group on P3P
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-p3p-specification/2000Aug/0110.html
> Having not heard back from your group, I assume
> you found our response satisfactory, or at least
> not sufficiently objectionable to continue the
> discussion at this time. Now that we have submitted
> our working draft for CR
> http://www.w3.org/P3P/Group/Specification/Drafts/WD-P3P-20001123a
> we have been asked to
> demonstrate that no other W3C working groups
> have outstanding concerns about P3P that should
> be addressed before going to CR. I would appreciate
> it if you could send a message to
> www-p3p-public-comments@w3.org
> confirming that the CC/PP working group has
> no outstanding concerns about P3P that should
> be addressed before P3P enters CR.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Lorrie Cranor
> P3P Specification Working Group Chair
--
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Johan Hjelm
Nippon Ericsson KK, Ericsson Research
Applications Research Group
Read more about my recent book at
http://www.wireless-information.net
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Received on Wednesday, 6 December 2000 18:48:02 UTC