Mr. Grissom, Sorry for confusing you. It is P3P validator's bug. It seems that I made a mistake when I updated the validator. I fixed the bug, and the validator accepts "LOC" at this point. Thank you for your contribution to the P3P activity. Regards, -- Yuichi Koike ( koike@ay.jp.nec.com ) NEC Corporation. > Anyone know why the LOC compact policy parameter no longer validates? I have > been using the W3C validation services. I have replied to an earlier post in the > IBM P3P editor forum that it appears that the W3C has possibly changed the P3P > specs. This was discovered after previous policies validated and then didn't > after a couple of weeks. > > I am new to the list serv and hope this isn't something that has already been > discussed if so my apologies. > > Robert Grissom > Senior Web Developer > Lexmark International > E-Business > > > >Received on Wednesday, 6 February 2002 10:36:31 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 17 January 2012 12:13:10 GMT