W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-p3p-policy@w3.org > October 2000

Re: APPEL

From: Lorrie Cranor <lorrie@research.att.com>
Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2000 15:30:55 -0500
Message-ID: <008d01c041e7$3318fba0$3a06cf87@research.att.com>
To: "Robert Ritchy" <rritchy@persona.com>, <www-p3p-policy@w3.org>
There is a new non-public APPEL working draft that
was published October 3. If your company
is a W3C member, you can access it now at
http://www.w3.org/P3P/Group/Preferences/Drafts/WD-P3P-preferences-20001006.html

At our working group meeting this week we will discuss
this draft and decide when to issue the next public draft.
My guess is that will be in the next few weeks. The October
draft is not tremendously different from the April draft.
The logic is still basically the same. The main differences
are in the treatment of behaviors.

Regards,

Lorrie Cranor
P3P Specification Working Group Chair

----- Original Message ----- 
From: Robert Ritchy <rritchy@persona.com>
To: <www-p3p-policy@w3.org>
Sent: Friday, October 27, 2000 2:45 PM
Subject: APPEL


> 
> Hello,
> 
> I noticed that you mentioned that there will be a new APPEL working draft
> soon.  Is there an estimate on when that's going to be published?  If
> there's no time table then I'd like to get a feeling of how different the
> new one will be than the current draft, dated April, 20 2000, before
> starting any development efforts.  I apologize if that's a weighted
> question - it's just that it's mentioned in the current working draft that
> the documented approach is just one of a number of possible specifications.
> I'm trying to avoid implementing something completely different.
> 
> Thanks for any help,
> Robert
> 
> 
Received on Sunday, 29 October 2000 15:32:30 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:01:07 UTC