W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-p3p-dev@w3.org > February 2002

Re: Is it necessary to add a P3P Header?

From: Lorrie Cranor <lorrie@research.att.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2002 13:41:57 -0500
Message-ID: <02ee01c1b007$1f17fd10$9816cf87@barbaloot>
To: <rgrissom@lexmark.com>, <www-p3p-dev@w3.org>
As I said, If you want to use compact policies,
you must use the header. And yes, if you
have third party cookies, you will want to
use compact policies so that they don't
get blocked by IE6.

Lorrie

----- Original Message -----
From: <rgrissom@lexmark.com>
To: <www-p3p-dev@w3.org>
Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2002 1:26 PM
Subject: Re: Is it necessary to add a P3P Header?


>
>
> Lorie,
>
> I was under the impression that you must pass a compact policy via the
header
> for 3rd party cookies to be excepted by IE 6.
>
> In our case we had to because the server that generates the 3rd party
cookie
> does not serv content.
>
> Robeert Grissom
> Lexmark International
>
>
>
> "Lorrie Cranor" <lorrie%research.att.com@interlock.lexmark.com> on
02/07/2002
> 10:06:00 AM
>
> To:   "Kristin Boyle" <kboyle%1to1.com@interlock.lexmark.com>,
>       www-p3p-dev%w3.org@interlock.lexmark.com,
>       www-p3p-policy%w3.org@interlock.lexmark.com
> cc:    (bcc: Robert Grissom/Lex/Lexmark)
> Subject:  Re: Is it necessary to add a P3P Header?
>
>
>
> No.
>
> If you have a policy reference file at /w3c/p3p.xml you do
> not need a P3P response header.
>
> If you want to use a compact policy, you will need
> to add an appropriate header.
>
> Lorrie
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Kristin Boyle" <kboyle@1to1.com>
> To: <www-p3p-dev@w3.org>
> Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2002 9:59 AM
> Subject: Is it necessary to add a P3P Header?
>
>
> > Is it necessary to add a P3P response header to your page to make the
> > privacy policy work?
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
Received on Thursday, 7 February 2002 13:49:45 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 18 June 2010 00:12:47 GMT