W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-p3p-dev@w3.org > February 2002

Re: Is it necessary to add a P3P Header?

From: <rgrissom@lexmark.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2002 13:26:23 -0500
Message-Id: <200202071826.NAA15137@interlock2.lexmark.com>
To: www-p3p-dev@w3.org


I was under the impression that you must pass a compact policy via the header
for 3rd party cookies to be excepted by IE 6.

In our case we had to because the server that generates the 3rd party cookie
does not serv content.

Robeert Grissom
Lexmark International

"Lorrie Cranor" <lorrie%research.att.com@interlock.lexmark.com> on 02/07/2002
10:06:00 AM

To:   "Kristin Boyle" <kboyle%1to1.com@interlock.lexmark.com>,
cc:    (bcc: Robert Grissom/Lex/Lexmark)
Subject:  Re: Is it necessary to add a P3P Header?


If you have a policy reference file at /w3c/p3p.xml you do
not need a P3P response header.

If you want to use a compact policy, you will need
to add an appropriate header.


----- Original Message -----
From: "Kristin Boyle" <kboyle@1to1.com>
To: <www-p3p-dev@w3.org>
Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2002 9:59 AM
Subject: Is it necessary to add a P3P Header?

> Is it necessary to add a P3P response header to your page to make the
> privacy policy work?
Received on Thursday, 7 February 2002 13:26:39 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 19:49:15 UTC