W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-multimodal@w3.org > May 2012

RE: [ARCH] Some typos in xsd

From: Deborah Dahl <dahl@conversational-technologies.com>
Date: Mon, 21 May 2012 15:06:30 -0400
To: "'Dr. Dirk Schnelle-Walka'" <dirk.schnelle@jvoicexml.org>
Cc: <www-multimodal@w3.org>
Message-ID: <001101cd3784$d5465720$7fd30560$@conversational-technologies.com>
Hi Dirk,
Thanks again for your interest in the Multimodal Architecture and Interfaces specification.
We have officially extended the implementation report deadline to June 15 (http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-multimodal/2012May/0014.html).
We would also like to clarify that it is indeed acceptable for an implementation report to be based on just a single modality component, and you are correct that it should fulfill the common test assertions and the MC test assertion. 
Since all of the implementation reports are archived on this list, there will automatically be a public link to your report from the archive for this list (http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-multimodal/) for every report. Several implementation reports have already been sent to the list. Please feel free to review them if that would be helpful.
Regards,
Debbie

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dr. Dirk Schnelle-Walka [mailto:dirk.schnelle@jvoicexml.org]
> Sent: Monday, May 21, 2012 3:29 AM
> To: Deborah Dahl
> Cc: www-multimodal@w3.org
> Subject: RE: [ARCH] Some typos in xsd
> 
> Hey Debbie,
> 
> thanks for the quick answer.
> 
> I had a look at the submission process for implementation reports. I
> understand that you have some interest in having more experiences with
> the specification. I also saw that the deadline for submitting a
> multimodal implementation report was on 29 February 2012 (taken from
> http://www.w3.org/2002/mmi/2012/mmi-arch-
> irp/Overview.html#participate)
> So that deadline was already extended?
> 
> For JVoiceXML I will not be going the whole way but implement only a
> voice modality component. Will that be sufficient? I assume that I will
> have to fulfil at least the "common test assertions" and the
> "MC-specific test assertions" as described in
> http://www.w3.org/2002/mmi/2012/mmi-arch-
> irp/Overview.html#participate
> 
> Will I be linked somewhere (to get something back at least)?
> 
> Best,
> Dirk
> 
> Am Dienstag, den 15.05.2012, 18:24 -0400 schrieb Deborah Dahl:
> > Hello Dirk,
> > Thanks for your comments on the MMI Architecture draft. Even though
> we're in the Candidate Recommendation period, we can fix typos like this in
> the next draft, which will be a Proposed Recommendation.
> > If you're close to completing your implementation of the MMI
> Architecture, you might want to consider submitting an implementation
> report. These reports help support the spec by demonstrating broad
> interest, and also help us understand what features people are most
> interested in.
> > The process is described in http://www.w3.org/TR/mmi-arch/.
> > Regards,
> > Debbie Dahl
> > MMI Working Group Chair
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Dr. Dirk Schnelle-Walka [mailto:dirk.schnelle@jvoicexml.org]
> > > Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2012 4:23 AM
> > > To: www-multimodal@w3.org
> > > Subject: [ARCH] Some typos in xsd
> > >
> > > Hey there,
> > >
> > > currently, I am about to implement a generic hook of a voice modality
> > > component for JVoiceXML. This hook will open source and will be
> > > available with the next release of my open source voice browser.
> > >
> > > I started with the XSD definitions that are given in appendix C of
> > > http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/CR-mmi-arch-20120112/
> > >
> > > I know that the comments are no longer welcome but there are some
> > > upper-lower case confusions in these XSD files. I assume that the
> > > element "statusInfo" defined in mmi-elements.xsd should be lower case,
> > > but some references are upper case. Occurences are in
> > > - C10 StartResponse.xsd
> > > - C13 CancelResponse.xsd
> > > - C15 PauseResponse.xsd
> > > - C17 ResumeResponse.xsd
> > > - C22 StatusResponse.xsd
> > >
> > > Although these schemas are only informative they should be corrected. It
> > > is only minimal effort and will help to avoid further confusion.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Dirk
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> 
Received on Monday, 21 May 2012 19:07:22 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 21 May 2012 19:07:23 GMT