RE: CC/PP and UAProf implementation experiences

Hi Janne!

Thanks for this information.  

Please note OMA (formerly WAP Forum) is aware some of UAProf's previously
released schemas have namespace-related problems and has corrected those
problems in their latest schema:

  http://www.wapforum.org/profiles/UAPROF/

Anyhow, one issue the UAProf group would like to address is automatic
schema processing.  For example, the over-loading of the rdfs:comment
property (for Type, Resolution, etc. information) needs work.  If you
have any suggestions on how that part of the schema could be improved
to better enable schema processing, I would be very interested in your
suggestions.

Regards,

Art Barstow
---
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: ext Janne Saarela [mailto:janne.saarela@profium.com]
> Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 8:58 AM
> To: www-mobile@w3.org
> Subject: CC/PP and UAProf implementation experiences
> 
> 
> 
> Hi all
> 
> I thought I share some views how Profium has implemented
> CC/PP and UAProf support in a semantic content management
> platform that builds natively on top of the RDF data model.
> 
> The following results apply to our Profium Semantic
> Information Router (SIR) V3.0.4 [1]. We have interest
> of incorporating CC/PP support to our product to provide
> contextual services. We currently manage metadata about
> content objects and users. The CC/PP extension would allow
> us to include device descriptions under the same evaluation
> framework thus taking into account device capabilities, too.
> 
> First of all, it was a straight-forward task of configuring
> the RDF schema for UAProf [2] to SIR. We had some
> trouble as we had to adjust the rdf schema namespaces which
> appeared to have an old reference to a 1999 namespace.
> 
> Second, we used the Ericsson and Mitsubishi profiles [3]
> for actual device data. Here, the Mitsubishi profile
> had to be adjusted for CC/PP namespace address.
> 
> After this preprocessing, SIR was able to receive
> and validate the profiles w.r.t RDF schemas.
> 
> After the validation, the RDF was stored to the persistent
> RDF store of SIR. Then a declarative query language (RDFQL
> developed by Profium) was applied to run queries on the data.
> The querying prooved succesful for the types of queries we
> quickly did. We would welcome use-case requirements for
> querying to test the query evaluation further.
> 
> These simple results do indicate that
> 1. RDF parsing is feasible
> 2. RDF schema based validation is feasible
> 3. RDF querying is feasible
> 
> Regards,
> Janne Saarela
> 
> [1] http://www.profium.com/gb/products/sir.shtml
> [2] http://www.wapforum.org/profiles/UAPROF/ccppschema-20000405#
> [3] http://www.w3.org/Mobile/CCPP/
> -- 
> Janne Saarela <janne.saarela@profium.com>
> Profium, Lars Sonckin kaari 12, 02600 Espoo, Finland
> Tel. +358 (0)9 855 98 000 Fax. +358 (0)9 855 98 002
> Mob. +358 (0)40 508 4767  Internet: http://www.profium.com
> 
>

Received on Monday, 23 September 2002 09:25:25 UTC