W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-mobile@w3.org > June 2002

RE: Validation in CC/PP

From: <Art.Barstow@nokia.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2002 15:58:52 -0400
Message-ID: <5C76D29CD0FA3143896D08BB1743296AB000AB@bsebe001.NOE.Nokia.com>
To: <Mark_Butler@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Cc: <w3c-ccpp-wg@w3.org>, <www-mobile@w3.org>

> From: ext Butler, Mark [mailto:Mark_Butler@hplb.hpl.hp.com]
> Well experience with existing CC/PP
> vocabularies has shown that even with a small number of 
> profiles, vendors
> make mistakes when creating profiles. For example they get 
> property names
> wrong e.g. use PixelsAspectRatio not PixelAspectRatio. There 
> is also no
> agreement on property literal values so two vendors might use the same
> literal to indicate different capabilities or different 
> literals to indicate
> the same capability e.g. "1.2.1/June 2000" and "1.2.1" are 
> used to refer to
> the same capability. 

Seems like these are general RDF issues rather than CC/PP-specific 

Why don't you guys just re-do CC/PP in RELAX-NG or XML Schema :-)


FYI - the following online RDFS visualization service may be

Received on Wednesday, 5 June 2002 15:59:02 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:16:03 UTC