- From: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>
- Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2013 09:27:47 +0100
- To: Frédéric WANG <fred.wang@free.fr>
- CC: www-math@w3.org
On 29/09/2013 01:48, David Carlisle wrote: > On 28/09/2013 18:43, Frédéric WANG wrote: >> >> should mention the arabic block, I think. Should probably be done at >> other places too. > > I added reference in the main place > > http://www.w3.org/Math/draft-spec/chapter3-d.html#presm.commatt > > The editors draft of the entities spec has been updated some time ago to Unicode 6.x and lists these characters by mathvariabnt so double-struck is extended http://www.w3.org/2003/entities/2007doc/double-struck.html initial http://www.w3.org/2003/entities/2007doc/initial.html tailed http://www.w3.org/2003/entities/2007doc/tailed.html looped http://www.w3.org/2003/entities/2007doc/looped.html stretched http://www.w3.org/2003/entities/2007doc/stretched.html Perhaps we should reference these in chapter 3 as they provide a direct table of the correspondence between the BMP character and mathvariant and the character in the 1EE00 block. That would probably mean submitting the entities spec to a revised REC at the same time as MathML. David
Received on Monday, 30 September 2013 08:28:22 UTC