From: Gurpreet Kaur <gur.trio@gmail.com>

Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2013 10:04:28 +0530

Message-ID: <CAKO=q7GaBXgksyEXuoO0vG_gBhUV5hRRSUYcgwh=RSyVGuKkNw@mail.gmail.com>

To: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>

Cc: "www-math@w3.org" <www-math@w3.org>

Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2013 10:04:28 +0530

Message-ID: <CAKO=q7GaBXgksyEXuoO0vG_gBhUV5hRRSUYcgwh=RSyVGuKkNw@mail.gmail.com>

To: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>

Cc: "www-math@w3.org" <www-math@w3.org>

Hi David, Thanks for the quick reply. Also there is one more concern. I have a test case with contents as <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" frame="solid" columnlines="dashed" rowlines="dashed" rowalign="top baseline bottom" columnalign="left right" columnspacing="4em" rowspacing="3ex"> <mtable> <mtr> <mtd> <mfrac> <mi>xxx</mi> <mi>y</mi> </mfrac> </mtd> <mtd> <mi>bbbb</mi> </mtd> <mtd> <mi>c</mi> </mtd> </mtr> <mtr> <mtd> <mfrac> <mi>x</mi> <mi>y</mi> </mfrac> </mtd> <mtd> <mi>y</mi> </mtd> <mtd> <mi>z</mi> </mtd> </mtr> <mtr> <mtd> <mfrac> <mi>x</mi> <mi>y</mi> </mfrac> </mtd> <mtd> <mn>2</mn> </mtd> <mtd> <mn>333333</mn> </mtd> </mtr> </mtable> </math> In this case the mtable attributes are applied to math instead of mtable. Mathjax and mathplayer support this and applied all the attributes to mtable. Is this correct? I mean these are mtable attributes and not math. Thanks and Regards, Gurpreet On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 7:12 PM, David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk> wrote: > On 16/01/2013 05:40, Gurpreet Kaur wrote: > >> Hi All, >> >> I had one query regarding the mtable content. I have a test page with >> content as below. >> >> <math> <mtable rowlines="solid" frame="solid" columnlines="solid"> >> <mtr> <mn>1111.23</mn> <mn>0</mn> <mn>0</mn> </mtr> </mtable> >> </math> >> >> In this since there are no <mtd> what would be expected behaviour? >> Will all mn be treated as content of different cell i.e should have 3 >> cells or just one dummy cell should be inserted and all mn become >> children of the same cell. >> >> Regards, Gurpreet >> > > > This form (which comes from MathML 1.0) has been deprecated since MathML > 2 and is considered invalid by the MathML3 schema however > the recovery is to treat each child of mtr that is not mtd as if it is > wrapped in am mtd. > > So rejecting the document as invalid or or tretaing it as a 3 column > table would both be acceptable behaviours. > > section 3.5.1.1 says > > > Inside of the mtable element, only mtr or mlabeledtr elements may >> appear. (In MathML 1.x, the mtable was allowed to ‘infer’ mtr >> elements around its arguments, and the mtr element could infer mtd >> elements. This behaviour is deprecated.) >> > > > David >Received on Tuesday, 22 January 2013 04:35:15 GMT

*
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50
: Tuesday, 22 January 2013 04:35:15 GMT
*