From: Neil Soiffer <NeilS@dessci.com>

Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2013 23:18:07 -0800

Message-ID: <CAESRWkAhvqRwofcOmKipt+zfSJcO=yN1REJR_xzOVbvcCqhZVQ@mail.gmail.com>

To: Gurpreet Kaur <gur.trio@gmail.com>

Cc: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>, "www-math@w3.org" <www-math@w3.org>

Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2013 23:18:07 -0800

Message-ID: <CAESRWkAhvqRwofcOmKipt+zfSJcO=yN1REJR_xzOVbvcCqhZVQ@mail.gmail.com>

To: Gurpreet Kaur <gur.trio@gmail.com>

Cc: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>, "www-math@w3.org" <www-math@w3.org>

In MathML 3, all mstyle attributes can be set on the math tag. Most attributes that can be set on an element can also be set on mstyle, and hence on math. So the behavior is correct. Neil Soiffer Senior Scientist Design Science, Inc. www.dessci.com ~ Makers of MathType, MathFlow, MathPlayer, MathDaisy, Equation Editor ~ On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 8:34 PM, Gurpreet Kaur <gur.trio@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi David, > > Thanks for the quick reply. > > Also there is one more concern. I have a test case with contents as > <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" frame="solid" > columnlines="dashed" rowlines="dashed" rowalign="top baseline bottom" > columnalign="left right" columnspacing="4em" rowspacing="3ex"> > <mtable> > <mtr> > <mtd> > <mfrac> > <mi>xxx</mi> > <mi>y</mi> > </mfrac> > </mtd> > <mtd> > <mi>bbbb</mi> > </mtd> > <mtd> > <mi>c</mi> > </mtd> > </mtr> > <mtr> > <mtd> > <mfrac> > <mi>x</mi> > <mi>y</mi> > </mfrac> > </mtd> > <mtd> > <mi>y</mi> > </mtd> > <mtd> > <mi>z</mi> > </mtd> > </mtr> > <mtr> > <mtd> > <mfrac> > <mi>x</mi> > <mi>y</mi> > </mfrac> > </mtd> > <mtd> > <mn>2</mn> > </mtd> > <mtd> > <mn>333333</mn> > </mtd> > </mtr> > </mtable> > </math> > > In this case the mtable attributes are applied to math instead of mtable. > Mathjax and mathplayer support this and applied all the attributes to > mtable. Is this correct? I mean these are mtable attributes and not math. > > Thanks and Regards, > Gurpreet > > On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 7:12 PM, David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk> wrote: > >> On 16/01/2013 05:40, Gurpreet Kaur wrote: >> >>> Hi All, >>> >>> I had one query regarding the mtable content. I have a test page with >>> content as below. >>> >>> <math> <mtable rowlines="solid" frame="solid" columnlines="solid"> >>> <mtr> <mn>1111.23</mn> <mn>0</mn> <mn>0</mn> </mtr> </mtable> >>> </math> >>> >>> In this since there are no <mtd> what would be expected behaviour? >>> Will all mn be treated as content of different cell i.e should have 3 >>> cells or just one dummy cell should be inserted and all mn become >>> children of the same cell. >>> >>> Regards, Gurpreet >>> >> >> >> This form (which comes from MathML 1.0) has been deprecated since MathML >> 2 and is considered invalid by the MathML3 schema however >> the recovery is to treat each child of mtr that is not mtd as if it is >> wrapped in am mtd. >> >> So rejecting the document as invalid or or tretaing it as a 3 column >> table would both be acceptable behaviours. >> >> section 3.5.1.1 says >> >> >> Inside of the mtable element, only mtr or mlabeledtr elements may >>> appear. (In MathML 1.x, the mtable was allowed to ‘infer’ mtr >>> elements around its arguments, and the mtr element could infer mtd >>> elements. This behaviour is deprecated.) >>> >> >> >> David >> > >Received on Tuesday, 22 January 2013 07:18:34 GMT

*
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50
: Tuesday, 22 January 2013 07:18:35 GMT
*