# Re: [mathjax-dev] Embellished operators

From: Patrick Ion <ion@ams.org>
Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2012 16:34:09 -0800
Message-ID: <4F46DB01.5030100@ams.org>


Thank you, Karl.  I'd forgotten that and the use case.  And this shows
that Paul's concerns were entirely well placed.

Patrick

On 2/23/12 1:03 PM, Karl Tomlinson wrote:
>> I am puzzled that it would be thought that the base, the first argument of
>> an element of type  <mover>, <munder> or <munderover> might be expected
>> to change its size automatically depending on the embellishment.
> Stretching the base to match the width of the scripts is described here:
>
> "If a stretchy operator, or an embellished stretchy operator, is a
> direct sub-expression of an munder, mover, or munderover element,
> or [...], then it, or the mo element at its core, should stretch
> to cover the width of the other direct sub-expressions in the
> given element [...]"
>
> http://www.w3.org/TR/MathML3/chapter3.html#presm.horiz.stretch.rules
>

Received on Friday, 24 February 2012 00:34:39 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:27:44 UTC