W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-math@w3.org > January 2009

MathML 3.0 far enough along for implementation?

From: Scott Hudson <scott.hudson@flatironssolutions.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 13:45:39 -0700
Message-ID: <4978DAF3.50200@flatironssolutions.com>
To: <www-math@w3.org>


I have a client that is in the midst of implementing a new content 
model. They are currently including MathML 2.0, but I wonder if the 
MathML 3.0 spec is far enough along and backward-compatible enough to 
recommend implementing against this spec? The immediate advantage, is 
that both schemas would be encoded in RelaxNG.

Thanks and best regards,

-- Scott
Scott Hudson
Senior XML Architect

e: scott.hudson@FlatironsSolutions.com
O: 303.542.2146
C: 303.332.1883
F: 303.544.0522

Vision. Experience. Engineering Excellence.
Received on Friday, 23 January 2009 08:27:50 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:27:41 UTC