- From: Paul Libbrecht <paul@activemath.org>
- Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2007 20:16:20 +0100
- To: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>
- Cc: hammond@math.albany.edu, www-math@w3.org
- Message-ID: <45BA5384.6050802@activemath.org>
It has been our experience that centered-math should rather be a
paragraph style.
This responds to the requirement of having formulae that are semantic
(and thus wouldn't bear a spurious period) and to have several formulae
in one line.
When going to XHTML+MathML, this i pretty easy to map out... just center
take care of putting the displaystyle in every math element.
paul
PS: I tend to be an non-friend of mtext... (and this saves the trip of
depth one compound-documents!)
David Carlisle wrote:
>> Are there reasonably easy ways in LaTeX of handling a
>> (document-level) end-of-sentence following a displaymath environment?
>>
>
> depends what you mean by "after"
>
> \[ 1=2 \rlap{\quad .}\]
>
> does more or less the right thing, but is technically inside the math of
> course, exactly the same issue as discussed foe <math>.
>
> similarly to the math suggestion you can do it outside as
>
> \par\(\displaystyle 1=2\).\par
>
> I think I have seen (and may even have written) a packahe that accepted
> markup such as
>
> \[ 1=2 \].
>
> that did the right thing (by essentially getting \] to lookahead see the
> punctuation and turn itself into \par\(\displaystyle 1=2\).\par
> but the problem with such things is that they are very fragile,
> redefining core latex commands tends to break everyone else's packages.
>
>
> David
>
>
>
Received on Friday, 26 January 2007 19:16:34 UTC