# Re: MathML-in-HTML5

From: Bruce Miller <bruce.miller@nist.gov>
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2006 11:58:12 -0400
Message-ID: <452E6614.4080504@nist.gov>
To: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>


David Carlisle wrote:
>> But David, you're _assuming_ XML rules for interpretting
>> namespaces! :>
>

Of course, I understood.  I was just taking the opportunity
to tease, and also the opportunity to summarize
(as I understand it) that we currently seem wedged
between a desire to simplify (and avoid namespaces)
and a desire for IE to work as is (w/o waiting \infty for IE8).

... I guess I'll take that as a further opportunity
to reiterate that point :>

>>> In application/xhtml+xml there seems to be more than one understanding...
> so xml is implied here (despite the subject line)
>
>> While I certainly sympathize with Bill on wanting to
>> have such nesting possibilities, I'm not fond of adding
>> in little bits here & there.  I'd much rather push for
>> a proper solution at the level of compound documents.
>
> We're in total agreement here, although whether that's because we've
> independently come to a naturally correct conclusion or if it's just
> that we've both been fully absorbed into the collective group-think of
> the working group, it's hard to tell...

A third possibility is that I've simply come under the
sway of your overwhelmingly domineering personality...

(sorry, I'm in a kind of jokey mood today).

--
bruce.miller@nist.gov
http://math.nist.gov/~BMiller/

Received on Thursday, 12 October 2006 15:58:25 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:27:38 UTC