- From: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>
- Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2006 16:48:27 +0100
- To: bruce.miller@nist.gov
- Cc: www-math@w3.org
> But David, you're _assuming_ XML rules for interpretting > namespaces! :> yes but I was answering Bill Hammond's question about >> In application/xhtml+xml there seems to be more than one understanding... so xml is implied here (despite the subject line) > While I certainly sympathize with Bill on wanting to > have such nesting possibilities, I'm not fond of adding > in little bits here & there. I'd much rather push for > a proper solution at the level of compound documents. We're in total agreement here, although whether that's because we've independently come to a naturally correct conclusion or if it's just that we've both been fully absorbed into the collective group-think of the working group, it's hard to tell... David
Received on Thursday, 12 October 2006 15:48:45 UTC