From: <juanrgonzaleza@canonicalscience.com>

Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2006 05:43:38 -0800 (PST)

Message-ID: <3531.217.124.69.224.1162907018.squirrel@webmail.canonicalscience.com>

To: <www-math@w3.org>

Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2006 05:43:38 -0800 (PST)

Message-ID: <3531.217.124.69.224.1162907018.squirrel@webmail.canonicalscience.com>

To: <www-math@w3.org>

> Step forward 1. No more extensibility. Some people has implemented versions of p-MathML with propietary extensions focusing on limitations of 2.0 spec thanks to extensibility of XML framework using propietary namespaces. Extensions i see are not backward incompatible with MathML 2.0 but a superset. This is another real life example where a browser closed HTML implementation is unlikely since not addresses real needs. > Step forward 3. No more UA independant DOM. > Firefox 1.5 > > <html> > <head> > <title>Serialization of tag-soup MathML-in-HTML</title> > </head> > <body> > <div><math > display="block'"><mrow><mn2></mn2><mo>+</mo><mn>2</mn></mrow></math></div> > </body> > </html>+2 Firefox 1.0 gives more funny soap <html> <head> <title>Serialization of tag-soup MathML-in-HTML</title> </head> <body> <div> </div> <div><math display="block'"><mrow =""><mn2 =""></mn2><mo>+</mo><mn>2</mn></mrow></math></div> </body></html>Received on Tuesday, 7 November 2006 13:57:07 UTC

*
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1
: Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:27:38 UTC
*