W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-math@w3.org > January 2004

Re: When to stretch parentheses

From: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>
Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2004 12:43:34 GMT
Message-Id: <200401301243.MAA23014@penguin.nag.co.uk>
To: mf@w3.org
Cc: Stephan.Semirat@ac-grenoble.fr, Vincent.Quint@inria.fr, www-math@w3.org

 is (in my opinion) acceptable. So maybe the rule should be flexible 
 and could depend on the operators between the subelements.

The current rule allows the author to unambiguously specify whether
you want the two groups of parens in 
to be sized separately based on the size of x and y, or whether you want
all four parens to be equal sized, based on the largest part of the

For the first case use (omitting  all tagging except mrow)


for the second case use


with, ideally, some extra grouping as well, eg that last one should
probably be

Although the inner mrows are for other purpses, they don't affect the
size of the parentheses which is the issue here.

> Or rather that the spec does not specify the best rendering in this
> case.

As others have pointed out, the spec does specify the rendering to use
here (it doesn't say whether that is best or not, but that is another


This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The
service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive
anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit:
Received on Friday, 30 January 2004 08:35:03 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:27:34 UTC